Episode #9682 - Tatted Up





*blank stare*
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 E-Rich wrote:
    I'm so sad for the child that has to grow up and find out that this tattoo is for him.
    Reply to this
    1. Tuesday, October 26. 2010 JaededJu wrote:
      co-sign^
      Reply to this
    2. Tuesday, October 26. 2010 GummiBears wrote:
      I second/third this.
      Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Voyce of reason wrote:
    This is jus plain old fuckery this poor child will have 2 deal wit the fact that his mama is a regular old block head And cnt find sumthn betta 2 do wit her money like sum diapers formula or Even a few sessions at curves she need 2 get her mind rite
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 infringedblue wrote:
    no this heffa did not tattoo over her stretch marks wtf?!

    You're supposed to cocoa butter it, not emphasis it, dammit!!
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 ThundaCunt wrote:
    concept aint too bad...if her son's name is King...the spot she picked is gross...what she gonna do if she has another baby? and why did she add them lil squiqqles and shit?
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Sadiqua wrote:
    wait. is...that a c-section scar? *sad face*
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 KingBigBallz wrote:
    Poor Lil King, I bet his middle name is Marquevious,

    Well let's look on the brighter side:

    On 9/12/2027 King, can legally divorce his dumb azz Momma and change his name all on the same day...Hooray!

    ADDED NOTE: On pic# 1 (hopefully your stomach is strong) BUT look all the way to the bottom and inside the paw print...yeah I warned you!
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Wizzy Jr. wrote:
    Ummmmm...RIIIGHT.
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 KJ wrote:
    I'm more sad that she has a tattoo on her saggy vajayjay.
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 truthbetold wrote:
    Looks like King walked on the surface of the sun before he burned her saggy, gelatinous stomach. Ppl make me sick!
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Pixie.Poo wrote:
    is that t.i`s wife tiny?? she shoulda got it on her lips lmaoo
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 KayBorn wrote:
    Okay this is obviously a woman with insecurities with her pregnancy stretch marks and she tried to cover them.....I understanf her reasoning, I truly do, and considering what we have seen on this site it could have been something much much worse, I just really realy truly hoping that this childs Name is not KING....I mean realy KING...why would you give him the common name of a PitBull....I give her a.........

    **Partial Fail**
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Chii... wrote:
    this is one of those good concept bad execution things. I'm all for tattooing your kid's name on you, the little feet are done well (shout to the tattoo artist) but betch you tried it by putting it there!
    and she needs to take lil Kang to the clinic with that herpes flair up in the top pic.
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Rena wrote:
    Yuck! This crusty hoe. My main concern is that pocket of fat she was hiding with her black panties in the first pic. WTF is it? How she got a big ass crease and then a big ole bag full of fat like that underneath? Just nasty. As if getting your child's name tattooed on your body wasn't already tacky enough, why do it right on the place you should be trying to hide? And on such an out of shape, ugly body? smh
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Phuckyall wrote:
    First of all,everybody on here talkin smack b/c dont nobody know who u r. U need to get some balls and say this shit to her face. Then see what happens. Second of all, I am glad that all of u haters on here aint got nuthn better to do besides talk about my sister like that. All ofu on here prob sittin at home bedridden because ur azz too fat to get outta the bed. Last and certainly not least, this is a woman who is proud of what she brought into this world. She is a syrong independant woman who can takr care of her own, unlike some of these hoes out here havin kids they cant take care of without making a trip to the Department of Social Services. So in summary, PHUCK ALL YALL!!
    Reply to this
    1. Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Monica wrote:
      Somebody naming their kid "King" should be enough to warrant a trip to Social Services.
      Reply to this
    2. Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Rena wrote:
      LOL Yeah, every single person on here is jealous of her secret fat pocket, stretch marks, c-section scar, and (likely) baby out of wedlock. You whores are delusional thinking that every single person who criticize you is somehow magically jealous "haters". It takes energy to hate. We are laughing at her. You act like you have no eyes to see how crusty that tattoo looks, or how sickening that pocket of fat is. Of course we don't know her, genius. But we don't need to know her to see the picture she put out for the whole world to see of her disgusting gut. Being strong and "independent" doesn't save her from being ugly, tacky and overweight. And you're the one worried about Social Services so much that you think you're a success just for not being on it. Honey, success is much more than that. So in summary, you're only mad because that's "your sister". If it were someone else, you would be laughing at this hot ass mess too. That is, if you have any damn sense.
      Reply to this
      1. Thursday, October 28. 2010 MissRealDeal wrote:
        Oooh Lawd!!!
        Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 DaMrs wrote:
    Ok so this is my first time posting on here, I usually just lurk and lol @ the comments but I had to respond to lil mama who is defending her sister. I find it very amusing how you and others come on here talking spit about everyone for giving their opinions on these travesties and saying everyone on here has no life....but what does that say about you, because you're on here just like we are, or were you just passing thru?!?
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Phuckyall wrote:
    How can u even say "ugly, tacky and overweight" when u cant even see any part of her body but whats n the picture? And if u lookn so hard at the picture to see her hoo ha then u need to b on a porn site and not on here. Even if I didnt know her I wouldnt b sayn the shit yall r b/c i think thats a devoted proud mother to put her childs name and footprints on her. Do u know anyone thats got your name on their body? I doubt it. And what does wedlock have to do with anything? Just because someone isnt married means they cant have a child? Ok, just keep thinking that and see where it gets you. This isnt 1965 anymore, these days uve got 14 & 15 year old children having babies they cant take care of. KING ( yes that is his name) is very well taken care of and has family that loves him. I am behind my sister 100% on her decisions no matter what. In the end I have more dam sense than most people on here. I usually dont do shit like this on sites like this cause Im not a cyberwhore. But when I found out about this I had to speak my mind.
    Reply to this
    1. Tuesday, October 26. 2010 Rena wrote:
      How can I say that when I can't see her whole body? That's the sad part. I can tell that much about her just by looking at the overweight, mishapen, scarred gut of hers that she got that tacky tattoo on.

      And her "hoo ha" isn't even in this picture. Even if it were, it's not attractive. And even if it were, she put it on the internet for all to see. She could have submitted it to an ugly-girl fetish site if she wanted.

      That's the problem with you rats. You think being a good mother means putting a tattoo on her body and spending her time showing it on the internet instead of spending time doing something of value.

      You probably think your only value would come if a nigga put your name on his body. That means nothing. I don't need that to feel validated, loved or appreciated.

      Hoe mentality. Sad. Right, you don't need a ring to lay down like a hoe with a dude you're not married to and let him skeet all up in you. Because it's a different year from 1965, we don't need to respect ourselves and our bodies. Riiight. You want to know where that thinking will get me? Into a successful career and relationship with a man who is willing to start a family with me.

      Of course you are defending her, she's your sister, which is why you're the last person who has the validity to refute what we say.

      No you don't have more sense than people on here. Your sister is a cyberwhore, even if you're not. You spoke your mind and it was stupid.
      Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 evelyn wrote:
    Umm. Do the baby feet have texture?
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 mochad wrote:
    I actually thought it was a R.I.P. sort of thing until the "sister" came on here. Did the "sister" send the picture? I never "know" anyone that is showed on here....wondering
    Reply to this
    1. Wednesday, October 27. 2010 no words wrote:
      I thought it was in memory of at first glance too.....btw, who did send that pic in? I have never known anyone that has,been shown on ghis site either....hmmmm
      Reply to this
  • Tuesday, October 26. 2010 DirtyRed55 wrote:
    "King"

    ...How fitting, cuz that DOES look like a Rottweiler's belly
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, October 27. 2010 LL wrote:
    Oh. Em. Gee. 9/12/09 is my wedding anniversary..... *sad face*
    Reply to this
  • Thursday, October 28. 2010 TDY wrote:
    tho, we all tend to enjoy this sites just for the unadulterated phuckery,this pic really had me second guessing my own sense of self. i've seen pics like this on other sites and never stopped to think that these people are someones sister,cousin, brother, mother father,etc.. this is my first time on this site and it's like "woooow"! is everybody w/ a camera phone a papparazzo? is everyone subject to public humiliation? is anyone allowed to take/receive pics of REAL people from anonymous sources and post them for all the world to see w/o their consent? YES,apparently. could this be you or me? YES. whether it is a personal photo as the one above,or a photo of u making a quick trip to the store or at the club actually looking cute (like a lot of the club pics on here)know that u too could be subjected to unwarranted ridicule. on our best and worst day someone will always have something to say about us. be kind to one another,ain't nothing wrong with lurking but some of these comments are out of control and most certainly out of some peoples REAL character(i hope). My cousin,yes my cousin, was proud of her first child and chose to commemorate his birth the way she saw fit. please believe she never chose her pic to be STOLEN,nor to be viewed by nameless faces on a website no less.SIDE NOTE:please don't use your real email address when posting comments. they are not published,but they are utilized to search individual's social network pages and capture the same type of material used on this site.
    Reply to this
  • Thursday, October 28. 2010 OOOOoooh wrote:
    my bruthrs name is King
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.